Problematika Kelas Menengah Indonesia: dari Agen Perubahan Menuju Pasivitas Politik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62976/ierj.v4i1.1790Keywords:
Middle Class, Political Passivity, Hegemony, Capitalism, IndonesiaAbstract
This study examines the problematic condition of Indonesia's middle class, which has undergone a transformation from an agent of socio-political change into a group that tends toward political passivity. The middle class, which historically played a role as a catalyst for change as evidenced in the 1998 reform movement and the national movement during the colonial era now faces a paradox: possessing substantial social capital, yet trapped in political apathy. This study aims to analyze the structural factors driving the political passivity of Indonesia's middle class within the context of global capitalism and post-reform political dynamics. The method employed is a qualitative approach through literature analysis. Data were drawn from books, scientific journals, research reports, and relevant articles related to the middle class, social change, and political passivity. The primary analytical framework used is Antonio Gramsci's theory of hegemony to dissect the mechanisms by which capitalism dominates middle-class consciousness. The findings reveal that the political passivity of Indonesia's middle class is a product of capitalist hegemony operating through three main channels: (1) a consumer culture that replaces solidarity-based social identity with consumption-based identity; (2) an education system oriented toward producing a capitalist workforce rather than critically engaged citizens; and (3) identity-based political populism that steers the middle class toward pragmatic support for the status quo. This phenomenon is exacerbated by the weakening role of organic intellectuals as a bridge between the middle class and collective consciousness. This study concludes that the revival of the middle class as an agent of change requires critical education, alternative political narratives, and the strengthening of social solidarity as a counter-hegemony against the dominance of global capitalism.
References
Ardiyanti, Dwi, and Ibnu Zulian. n.d. “KORELASI IDENTIFIKASI APATISME POLITIK DENGAN KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK KOTA MEDAN.”
Asiva Noor Rachmayani. 2015. “KELAS MENENGAH SEBAGAI BASIS PEMBANGUNAN: TELAAH PERSPEKTIF WEBBER,” 6.
Cuk, Oleh :, and Ananta Wijaya. n.d. “FILSAFAT EKONOMI ADAM SMITH.” http://www.econ.lib.
Fansuri, Hamzah. 2017. “Konsumerisme Dan Hegemoni Barat Terhadap Masyarakat Negara Berkembang: Perspektif Antonio Gramsci.” Journal of Integrative International Relations 3 (2): 33–51. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4891745.
Hapsari, Murti Ayu, Sri Handayani Retna Wardhani, Nita Ariyani, and Devi Andani. 2022. “Bahaya Apatisme Pemuda Terhadap Kehidupan Bernegara: Edukasi Partisipasi Politik Karang Taruna Ira Kusuma Yogyakarta.” DAS SEIN: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Dan Humaniora 2 (2): 105–17. https://doi.org/10.33756/jds.v2i2.15180.
Haryanto. 2017. Elit, Massa, Dan Kekuasaan: Suatu Bahasan Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Penerbit PolGov.
Hutagalung Daniel. 2004. “Hegemoni, Kekuasan Dan Ideologi.” Jurnal Pemikiran Sosial, Politik Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 12 (12): 1–17.
Khiyaroh, Intihaul. 2021. “Analisis Masyarakat Konsumsi: Komodifikasi Jomblo Melalui Speed Dating.” Alamtara: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam 5 (1): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.58518/alamtara.v5i1.856.
Kirom, Sazali. 2013. “DINAMIKA PERKEMBANGAN GERAKAN SERIKAT PEKERJA DI INDONESIA ( MASA KOLONIAL – ORDE LAMA ) Sazalil Kirom.” AVATARA, e-Journal Pendidikan Sejarah 1 (1).
Kuntowijoyo. 2013. Peran Borjuasi Dalam Transformasi Eropa. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
Kushendrawati, Selu Margaretha. 2006a. “MASYARAKAT KONSUMEN SEBAGAI CIPTAAN KAPITALISME GLOBAL: FENOMENA BUDAYA DALAM REALITAS SOSIAL.” Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia 10 (2): 49. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v10i2.19.
———. 2006b. “Masyarakat Konsumen Sebagai Ciptaan Kapitalisme Global: Fenomena Budaya Dalam Realitas Sosial.” Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia 10 (2): 49. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v10i2.19.
Mawaddah, Ruth Grace Lumbantoruan, Hertati Sitanggang, Suci Larasati, Tengku Riza Valefi, Joyanti Sirait, Brena Rizky, and Flores Tanjung. 2024. “Perkembangan Koloni Inggris Di Amerika Dan Terjadinya Revolusi Amerika Dari Kemenangan Kesusilaan.” Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research 2 (6): 156–61. https://doi.org/10.62504/jimr558.
Namang, Raimundus Bulet. n.d. “NEGARA DAN WARGA NEGARA PERSPEKTIF ARISTOTELES.”
Nur Budiman, Bachtiar, Bella Dewi Safitri, Balilah Rizki Putriga, and Vinona Julietta Imanuella Wicaksono. 2022. “Populisme: Konsekuensi Dari Stagnasi Politik Dan Demokrasi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal PolGov 4 (1): 211–43. https://doi.org/10.22146/polgov.v4i1.3916.
Wasisto Raharjo Jati. 2016. “Kelas Menengah Dalam Bingkai Middle Indonesia.” Jurnal Politik 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v1i2.1125.
Prabowo, Rechardus Deaz. 2019. “PEMIKIRAN MODERNISASI EKONOMI BUMIPUTRA DALAM SURAT KABAR BOEDI OETOMO DAN SOEARA MOEHAMMADIJAH DI HINDIA BELANDA (1920-1928).” Handep: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Budaya 3 (1): 33–54. https://doi.org/10.33652/handep.v3i1.55.
Raharjo Jati, Wasisto. n.d. “MEMBANGUN PARTISIPASI POLITIK KELAS MENENGAH MUSLIM INDONESIA.” https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2016.11.2.375-400.
Saefulloh Fatah, Eep. 1998. Catatan Atas Gagalnya Politik Orde Baru,. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Siswati, Endah. 2018. “Anatomi Teori Hegemoni Antonio Gramsci.” Translitera : Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Dan Studi Media 5 (1): 11–33. https://doi.org/10.35457/translitera.v5i1.355.
———. n.d. “ANATOMI TEORI HEGEMONI ANTONIO GRAMSCI.”
Soebantardjo. n.d. Sari Sejarah: Eropa-Amerika. Jogjakarta: Bopkri.
Sutherland, Heather. 1983. Heather Sutherland, Terbentuknya Sebuah Elite Birokrasi, Jakrta: Sinar Harapan, 1983, Hal. 114. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












