The Level of Difficulty of the Midterm Assessment of the Chemical Bonding Course in Chemistry Education, Uin Antasari
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62976/ierj.v3i3.1382Keywords:
Difficulty level, exam, chemical bondingAbstract
To determine the success of an educational program, an evaluation is required. The process of compiling questions in the chemistry education study program at UIN Antasari has not paid much attention to the level of difficulty of the questions. The purpose of this study is to determine the level of difficulty of the Midterm Assessment of the Chemical Bonding course in Chemistry Education, UIN (State Islamic University) Antasari in the Odd Semester of the 2021/2022 Academic Year. This study uses a quantitative descriptive method. The analysis in this study is carried out quantitatively by calculating data based on a formula, then the results of the data obtained are described descriptively. The data collection techniques and tools used in this study are interviews and documentations in the form of grids, questions, answer keys, and answer sheets.This test has 9 questions given to 12 students. The results of this study are that there are 6 questions (66.7%) in the moderate category and 3 questions (33.3%) in the easy category and no questions in the difficult category (0%) so that it can be said that these questions have good quality. Questions with good quality can be stored in the question bank to be reused in future evaluation activities, while questions that are not good quality must be discarded or changed.
References
Alpusari, M. (2014). Analysis of Basic Science Concept Question Items 1 Through the Use of Anates Computer Program Version 4.0 For Windows. Primary Journal of Elementary School Teacher Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Riau .3(2)
Anas, S. 2012. Introduction to Educational Evaluation. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.
Arifin, Zainal. 2012. Learning Evaluation. Jakarta: Directorate General of Islamic Education
Arikunto, & Suharsimi. 2009. Basics of Educational Evaluation. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Dia,eva.(2022). Transformation of Education Based on Research Results and Community Service in the Era of Independent Learning. Fourth Conference on Research and Community Services STKIP PGRI Jombang 24 SEPTEMBER 2022
Febriana, Rina. 2019. Learning Evaluation. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Hairida, E., & Lestari, I. (2015). Students' conceptual understanding of chemical bonding material through self-assessment Muhammadiyah 1 in Pontianak. sma Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 4(8). https://doi.org/10.26418/JPPK.V4I8.11061
Mardapi, D. 2017. Measurement,Assessment, and Evaluation of Education. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing
Ngalim, P. 2002. Principles and Techniques of Teaching Evaluation. Bandung: Remadja Karya.
Qodir, Abdul. 2017. Evaluation and Assessment of Learning. Yogyakarta: K-Media.
Ratnawulan, Elis, et al. 2014 .Learning Evaluation. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Slameto. 2006. Educational Evaluation. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Suharsimi, Arikunto.2010 . Basics of educational evaluation/Suharsimi Arikunto, Revised Ed., 11th ed. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Sundayana. 2016. Educational research statistics. Bandung: Alphabeta
Suwarto. (2016). Characteristics of Biology Tests for Grade 7 Odd Semester. Journal of Humanities Research .17(1).
Umar, Ahmat s, et al. (2023.) Identification of Students' Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Bonding Material Using Three Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry.5(1)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












