The Level of Difficulty of the Midterm Assessment of the Chemical Bonding Course in Chemistry Education, Uin Antasari

Authors

  • Siska Oktapianti UIN Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar,West Sumatra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62976/ierj.v3i3.1382

Keywords:

Difficulty level, exam, chemical bonding

Abstract

To determine the success of an educational program, an evaluation is required. The process of compiling questions in the chemistry education study program at UIN Antasari has not paid much attention to the level of difficulty of the questions. The purpose of this study is to determine the level of difficulty of the  Midterm Assessment of  the Chemical Bonding course in  Chemistry Education, UIN (State Islamic University) Antasari in  the Odd Semester of the 2021/2022 Academic Year. This study uses a quantitative descriptive method. The analysis in this study is carried out quantitatively by calculating data based on a formula, then the results of the data obtained are described descriptively. The data collection techniques and tools used in this study are interviews and documentations  in the form of grids, questions, answer keys, and answer sheets.This test has 9 questions given to  12 students.  The results of this study are that there are  6 questions (66.7%) in the moderate category and 3 questions (33.3%) in the easy category and no questions  in the difficult category (0%) so that it can be said that these questions have  good quality.   Questions with good quality can be stored in the question bank to be reused in future evaluation activities, while questions that are not good quality must be discarded or changed.

References

Alpusari, M. (2014). Analysis of Basic Science Concept Question Items 1 Through the Use of Anates Computer Program Version 4.0 For Windows. Primary Journal of Elementary School Teacher Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Riau .3(2)

Anas, S. 2012. Introduction to Educational Evaluation. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Arifin, Zainal. 2012. Learning Evaluation. Jakarta: Directorate General of Islamic Education

Arikunto, & Suharsimi. 2009. Basics of Educational Evaluation. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Dia,eva.(2022). Transformation of Education Based on Research Results and Community Service in the Era of Independent Learning. Fourth Conference on Research and Community Services STKIP PGRI Jombang 24 SEPTEMBER 2022

Febriana, Rina. 2019. Learning Evaluation. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Hairida, E., & Lestari, I. (2015). Students' conceptual understanding of chemical bonding material through self-assessment Muhammadiyah 1 in Pontianak. sma Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 4(8). https://doi.org/10.26418/JPPK.V4I8.11061

Mardapi, D. 2017. Measurement,Assessment, and Evaluation of Education. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing

Ngalim, P. 2002. Principles and Techniques of Teaching Evaluation. Bandung: Remadja Karya.

Qodir, Abdul. 2017. Evaluation and Assessment of Learning. Yogyakarta: K-Media.

Ratnawulan, Elis, et al. 2014 .Learning Evaluation. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Slameto. 2006. Educational Evaluation. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Suharsimi, Arikunto.2010 . Basics of educational evaluation/Suharsimi Arikunto, Revised Ed., 11th ed. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Sundayana. 2016. Educational research statistics. Bandung: Alphabeta

Suwarto. (2016). Characteristics of Biology Tests for Grade 7 Odd Semester. Journal of Humanities Research .17(1).

Umar, Ahmat s, et al. (2023.) Identification of Students' Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Bonding Material Using Three Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry.5(1)

Downloads

Published

11-09-2025

How to Cite

Oktapianti, S. . (2025). The Level of Difficulty of the Midterm Assessment of the Chemical Bonding Course in Chemistry Education, Uin Antasari. Interdisciplinary Explorations in Research Journal, 3(3), 841–847. https://doi.org/10.62976/ierj.v3i3.1382

Issue

Section

Articles